There is encouraging news from Somalia for women's right in Africa. Fadumo Dayib who was once a Somali refugee and who transformed her life to become a Harvard graduate and mother, is running for the country's number one job. She has a Bachelor’s degree
in Nursing, a Master’s degree from Harvard in Public administration (and two
other Master’s degrees From Finland and is working on a Ph.D. However, she is
currently making a huge sacrifice to run as Somali’s first female president in a
country with dismal human rights record and a long history of oppression
against women. She sees her decision to run as a moral obligation and a civic
duty to her country to enable millions of Somalis in diaspora and those
internally displaced to have a dignified existence to go back to. She believes
in Somalia and loves her country and is not afraid to take the risks to
transform her Country. This is indeed commendable and a definite encouragement
to all women of virtue that they can overcome the past and still be a
blessing to the world by self-development. We wish her success and wish all
women aspiring to be useful to the world and offer genuine service to humanity,
success in their endeavours. And it maybe high time Nigerian women rose up to
the challenge of uniting behind their best women to turn the nation around, by offering quality leadership.
http://www.npr.org/2016/07/10/485432471/once-a-somali-refugee-she-s-now-running-as-somalia-s-first-female-president
Thursday, 21 July 2016
Tuesday, 5 April 2016
WOMEN'S RIGHTS NEWS AROUND THE GLOBE
In a boost for women’s campaign against gender bias in
India, a public interest litigation challenging prohibition of women in temples
like Shani Shingnapur in Maharashtra has led to directions from the Bombay High
Court on 1st April that women can no longer be barred from entering
temples in Maharashtra as it is their fundamental right and it was the
fundamental duty of government to protect women’s right. It equally asked the
Maharashtra government to take pro-active steps to ensure that this right was
not encroached upon by any authority.
This landmark decision is a break from centuries old
tradition that restricted or discriminated against women in worship. This
judgment however has not totally resolved the issue as there are still places of worship where women’s entry is
banned. The advocates still intend to prevail on the Prime Minister Narendra
Modi to enact a law to put an end to such restrictions on worshipping. See http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-shani-temple-row-activist-trupti-desai-wants-to-end-gender-bias-in-other-temples-wishes-to-meet-pm-narendra-modi-2197012
Meanwhile in Nigeria, On March 15 2016, the Nigerian Senate blocked a bill
seeking equal marital rights for women. The Bill was titled “Gender Parity and
Prohibition of Violence against Women” and was presented by Abiodun Olujimi,
representing Ekiti South. The bill made provisions for equal rights of women in
marriage, education and employment.
The deputy senate president, Ike Ekweremadu, put his weight
behind the bill stating that those countries that are doing well are those who
give women opportunities
The Senate Majority leader, Ali Ndume, criticized the bill
while extolling the virtues of religious or traditional marriage as practiced
in Nigeria. The bill was also condemned by Sani Yerima who stated that it
negates the principles of the Sharia Law recognized by the Nigerian
Constitution and thus was in conflict with the Nigerian Constitution. The bill
was defeated when the senate president put it to the vote.
This development seems to ignore the obligations undertaken by Nigeria in ratifying the
Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against women,
especially in articles 2 and 16 of the Convention. Since Nigeria did not enter
any reservations to the Convention it behoves her to fulfill her obligations in
respect of discrimination of women in marital life, which is further elaborated
on in general recommendation 29 on Economic Consequences of Marriage, family
relations and their dissolution.
Friday, 1 January 2016
RELIGION AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS 1
Reply
to Objection 2: “Subjection is twofold. One is servile, by virtue of which a
superior makes use of a subject for his own benefit; and this kind of
subjection began after sin. There is another kind of subjection which is called
economic or civil, whereby the superior makes use of his subjects for their own
benefit and good; and this kind of subjection existed even before sin. For good
order would have been wanting in the human family if some were not governed by
others wiser than themselves. So by such a kind of subjection woman is
naturally subject to man, because in man the discretion of reason predominates” - Thomas Aquinas (Summa Theologica)
Quran 4:34 - Men are
overseers over women because Allah has given the one more strength than the other, and because
men are required to spend their wealth
for the maintenance of women.
INTRODUCTION
• Women
rights activists view religion as a threat to women’s rights
• This
springs from the fact that religion prescribes roles for women which
subordinates them and requires them to be obedient to men
• In
issues of reproductive health and control of their bodies, encompassing such
matters as use of contraception, and the right to have an abortion, religion
plays a major part in determining the stance taken by society. This has thus
been seen as religious interference in the rights of women
• According
to Rebecca J. Cook of University of Toronto “the world’s most influential
religious authorities claim to distinguish between right and wrong relations
between the sexes, and acceptable and unacceptable personal sexual behaviour.
They are frequently jealous of their control of the field of sexual and
reproductive morality, and fearful of the developments in biology that liberate
individuals to achieve their reproductive purposes, to enjoy sexual
relationships without unwanted pregnancy, and to overcome infertility by means
of medically assisted reproduction”
• Religious
law prescribes personal status, inheritance rights, criminal and civil
procedure, right of the partners in marriage, divorce etc. These are sometimes
in conflict with international notions of human rights and women rights
particularly
• Rebecca
J. Cook further stated “Many conservative religions dominated by men who
exclude women, are unaware of how women live their lives, and advance doctrines
opposed to women’s equality with men in personal, family, social and
legislative decision-making”
• Women’s
rights seeks to eliminate all forms of discrimination against women and to achieve
equality between men and women in all spheres (public and political life,
health employment, nationality, marriage etc)
• Advocates
of women rights contend that if indeed human rights are universal, inalienable
and indivisible, then it ought to apply to women to the same degree it applies
to men
• Owing
to stereotypes associated with culture and religion, most women have been
sidelined, marginalized and relegated to the background.
• This
is construed as a denial of the rights of women and has been the driving reason
for the agitation for their rights.
• Since
government action is mainly restricted to the public sphere and it is
restricted from interfering in the private sphere, like the family, most
violations of women’s rights which occur in private like domestic violence,
custodial rape, etc are oftentimes not redressed
• Owing
to the fact that freedom of religion is a fundamental human right protected by
international and municipal laws, there necessarily arises a conflict between
values protected by these rights- the value of freedom protected by the freedom
of religion and the value of equality and non-discrimination protected by
women’s rights.
• In
the absence of a normative hierarchy of rights in international human rights
law, there is no laid down rule for resolving these conflicts, and ingenuity is
required to balance these rights in such a way as to ensure justice.
Nonso Robert Attoh
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
